Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness
Date: 2004-10-10 09:25:23
Message-ID: 41690003.2010905@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm hoping that some of you can shed some light on this.
>
> I've been trying to peg the "sweet spot" for shared memory using OSDL's
> equipment. With Jan's new ARC patch, I was expecting that the desired
> amount of shared_buffers to be greatly increased. This has not turned out to
> be the case.
>
> The first test series was using OSDL's DBT2 (OLTP) test, with 150
> "warehouses". All tests were run on a 4-way Pentium III 700mhz 3.8GB RAM
> system hooked up to a rather high-end storage device (14 spindles). Tests
> were on PostgreSQL 8.0b3, Linux 2.6.7.

I'd like to see these tests running using the cpu affinity capability in order
to oblige a backend to not change CPU during his life, this could drastically
increase the cache hit.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Garamond 2004-10-10 11:07:54 Re: postgres vulnerability
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-10-10 09:13:27 Re: postgres vulnerability

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2004-10-10 21:48:48 Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-10-10 09:19:59 kernel 2.6 synchronous directory