Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Performance of COPY for Archive operations

From: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance of COPY for Archive operations
Date: 2004-10-08 16:23:47
Message-ID: 4166BF13.5080307@x-ray.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Bruce Momjian schrieb:
> I guess we will wait to see what problem reports we get from users.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>We already have a warning that prints when checkpoints happen too
>>frequently.   I wonder if we should print a warning if the number of WAL
>>records doubles from its maximum which is checkpoint_segments*2+1 I
>>think.

I can confirm this also for cygwin.
checkpoints happen too frequently with the default settings.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

In response to

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Gaetano MendolaDate: 2004-10-08 21:05:01
Subject: Re: more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-10-08 15:30:13
Subject: Re: Performance of COPY for Archive operations

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group