Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability
Date: 2004-09-29 23:05:19
Message-ID: 415B3FAF.5020700@postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
>>The big obstacle in moving anything is bandwidth.   While any number
>>of companies will offer to host stuff for us, we can't match the
>>amount of bandwidth we're currently using in Panama
> 
> ... which amounts to exactly what?

If it's helpful, I can ask my boss here if we're willing to host the PG 
project.

Lots of bandwidth and grunty servers.

Any rough ballpark figures on the amount of bandwidth we'd have to 
figure in?  i.e. xxx per month?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-09-29 23:13:20
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-09-29 22:29:42
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] web code update

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-09-29 23:13:20
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-09-29 22:29:42
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] web code update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group