Re: tsearch2 poor performance

From: Kris Kiger <kris(at)musicrebellion(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tsearch2 poor performance
Date: 2004-09-27 16:32:30
Message-ID: 4158409E.8060109@musicrebellion.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

Regardless of caching, the queries are still taking 19~20 seconds to run
on the 3,000,000 rows. I've played with performance tuning and nothing
seems to make much of a difference. If I am reading that list from stat
correctly, then I am operating on 508 distinct words. Is this the
performance I should expect from tsearch2? Or is something still awry?
I'm inclined to think something else is wrong, after reading some
other people's tsearch performance stats. Thanks!

Kris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-09-27 17:02:37 Re: tsearch2 poor performance
Previous Message Gonzales,S 2004-09-27 14:50:42 securing template1

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-09-27 17:02:37 Re: tsearch2 poor performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-09-27 14:20:43 Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Version numbering patch