Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.4 vs 7.3 ( hash join issue )

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 7.4 vs 7.3 ( hash join issue )
Date: 2004-09-23 14:04:20
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-patchespgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>>No, postgres didn't do things in reverse order. It hashed the empty table and
>>then went ahead and checked every record of the non-empty table against the
>>empty hash table.
>>Reading the code there's no check for this, and it seems like it would be a
>>useful low-cost little optimization.
> Yeah, I was just looking at doing that.
> It would also be interesting to prefetch one row from the outer table and fall
> out immediately (without building the hash table) if the outer table is
> empty.  This seems to require some contortion of the code though :-(
>>I think postgres normally hashes the table it thinks is smaller,
> Right, it will prefer to put the physically smaller table (estimated
> width*rows) on the inside.

Do you plan to do a patch for the 7.4, so I'll wait for a 7.4.6 ( that IIRC have already
two important patches pending ) or is 8.0 stuff ?

Gaetano Mendola

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Harald FuchsDate: 2004-09-23 14:24:46
Subject: Re: Caching of Queries
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-23 13:35:45
Subject: Re: O_DIRECT setting

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Michael PaesoldDate: 2004-09-23 20:04:29
Subject: Re: psql: rollback only last query on error
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-23 13:20:45
Subject: Re: SSL Error Code logging.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group