Dave Cramer wrote:
> I'd also like to understand the use of the LPGL license on a postgresql
When I started this project, I had very little experience about
licenses. I knew that LGPL were created to enable library projects and
so I decided to use it.
Sorry if I did a mistake about that. :(
> I'd go further than saying businesses are ambivalent about GPL, and or
> LPGL; in my experience business's prefer the freebsd license.
Yeah, today I know that! :)
I could ask all developers who contributed to project their permission
to change the code to bsd license, but, in IMHO, I think this wouldn't
be necessary, as LGPL fullfills the requirements of Npgsql licensing.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong. ;) I welcome all and any feedback
possible about that.
Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Francisco Figueiredo Jr.||Date: 2004-09-20 22:59:14|
|Subject: Returning just one resultset from function call with refcursor return|
|Previous:||From: Csaba Nagy||Date: 2004-09-20 16:19:01|
|Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.|