Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] VC++ psql build broken

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,PgSQL Win32 developers <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] VC++ psql build broken
Date: 2004-09-12 22:54:19
Message-ID: 4144D39B.9010806@pse-consulting.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
> 
>>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>>How does your Win32 system rename prototype differ from what is in
>>>port.h?
>>
>>What is the need of *any* special file handling functions for client tools?
> 
> 
> We could avoid it but it does give us Unix semantics so it seemed good
> to keep it if we could.
> 

As you can see it creates much pain, without any use. The functions are 
for backend concurrent/shared access purposes only.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-12 23:03:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] VC++ psql build broken
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-09-12 22:42:21
Subject: WIP: SetQuerySnapshot redesign

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-12 23:03:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] VC++ psql build broken
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-12 22:17:15
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] VC++ psql build broken

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group