Re: your posting

From: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: your posting
Date: 2004-09-12 11:55:33
Message-ID: 41443935.6020103@sympatico.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Simon Riggs wrote:

>
>That's good news.
>
>IMHO one of the areas that lacks good documentation is "how to contribute".
>Efforts in this area will be repaid with interest (literally).
>
>

That's a good idea for a column.

>I found it very difficult to wade through the various disconnected documents
>that describe how this might be possible. Some are too long, others are too
>short and some somewhat misleading for beginners.
>
>

You need two kinds of people to make documentation good: a writer who
loves his subject and an editor who makes sure the writer's enthusiasm
gets translated into a solid message.

>http://development.openoffice.org/index.html
>OpenOffice's developer page is probably a model of clarity.
>
>

You know, I've never looked at the openoffice site at all :-[

>perhaps and external focus might help promote as well as inform..such as writing a
>column for a well known magazine? (No suggestions, but then we're on
>different continents).
>
>

I've always liked the O'Reilly, http://onlamp.com, approach. You ask
them if you can write on a subject, most of the time they say yes. and
after a bit of editing it gets posted. It's to their advantage that they
accept your work because they can gauge the public's interest in a
particular subject. The site also makes an excellent training ground for
would be book authors too.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-09-12 19:41:14 Re: Draft Seven
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2004-09-12 11:33:47 Re: your posting