Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict

From: "Greg Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Date: 2008-12-01 15:33:28
Message-ID: 4136ffa0812010733v7c337779l47e6ec6a0e566002@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

How would you parse an input format of just 'SS' ? is there something
ambiguous about '3' ? I don't see anything "bad" about using %d to
output an integer number of seconds.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-12-01 15:34:46 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-12-01 15:31:51 Re: Statement-level triggers and inheritance