Re: debuging postgres

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: debuging postgres
Date: 2004-08-24 18:39:37
Message-ID: 412B8B69.7020907@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
>
>>Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>
>>>./configure --enable-debug
>
>
>>Is this enough? I'm seeing that with --enable-debug only the
>>option -g is passed to the compiler and the option -O2 is
>>still there, is it not better compile with -O0 if you are
>>going to debug it?
>
>
> If you want to single-step through the code a lot, then -O0 is good.
> But are you really gonna do that so much? I do most of my tracing
> at the level of function calls.

Of course not, but given that I don't know nothing I guess at the
beginning in order to see what is going on and understand how the code
work I need to "inspect" some variables some times.

> I tend to use -O1 as a compromise setting --- the code isn't totally
> scrambled but it doesn't run like a dog either. (Also, for development
> purposes, -O0 is evil because it disables certain useful warnings in
> gcc.)

Thank you for the advice.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-24 19:07:23 Re: Effective Cache Size
Previous Message Darcy Buskermolen 2004-08-24 17:48:07 Effective Cache Size