Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types
Date: 1998-10-21 14:25:55
Message-ID: 4129.908979955@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The big question is how many people have _live_ data in 6.4 beta
> databases, who don't want to initdb for 6.4 final, and can't use
> pg_upgrade to move to 6.4 final.

Hey, sounds like an opportunity for pg_upgrade to get some beta testing.
I know I haven't even touched it yet (I just initdb'd the last few
times), but I will try it for this if it will work for updating a
6.4beta database to the new state.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-21 15:42:18 Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types
Previous Message David Hartwig 1998-10-21 12:39:53 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] using indexes with the OR clause