Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Steve Bergman <steve(at)rueb(dot)com>,"Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Date: 2004-08-18 03:27:58
Message-ID: 4122CCBE.6040505@joeconway.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> 
>>Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)
> 
>>Version 3 is now available: fixes the init script. Previously 
>>/etc/init.d/postgresql worked the first time used (i.e. would initdb and 
>>start postgres) but not the second and subsequent times.
> 
> [ blink... ]  Was this your own error, or are you saying there is such a
> bug in the current RPM distributions?
> 

My own. I missed changing this line:
   if [ `cat $PGDATA/PG_VERSION` != '7.4' ]
to this:
   if [ `cat $PGDATA/PG_VERSION` != '8.0' ]

That code section gets skipped over in the case that no initdb has yet 
been performed, so I didn't notice until I went to restart the server.

Joe

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-08-18 03:36:30
Subject: Re: to_char() and negative intervals
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-18 03:24:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Joe SundayDate: 2004-08-18 03:44:51
Subject: Re: new install starting backend
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-18 03:24:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-18 03:39:36
Subject: Re: Problem analyzing performance of query
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-18 03:24:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group