Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Steve Bergman <steve(at)rueb(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Date: 2004-08-18 03:27:58
Message-ID: 4122CCBE.6040505@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>
>>Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)
>
>>Version 3 is now available: fixes the init script. Previously
>>/etc/init.d/postgresql worked the first time used (i.e. would initdb and
>>start postgres) but not the second and subsequent times.
>
> [ blink... ] Was this your own error, or are you saying there is such a
> bug in the current RPM distributions?
>

My own. I missed changing this line:
if [ `cat $PGDATA/PG_VERSION` != '7.4' ]
to this:
if [ `cat $PGDATA/PG_VERSION` != '8.0' ]

That code section gets skipped over in the case that no initdb has yet
been performed, so I didn't notice until I went to restart the server.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Sunday 2004-08-18 03:44:51 Re: new install starting backend
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-18 03:24:14 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-18 03:39:36 Re: Problem analyzing performance of query
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-18 03:24:14 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-18 03:36:30 Re: to_char() and negative intervals
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-18 03:24:14 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?