Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?

From: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Date: 2002-12-30 21:31:45
Message-ID: 4122.24.112.166.30.1041283905.squirrel@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne said:
> There have been HEAPS of security fixes between 7.2 and 7.3.

That's only the case if your definition of a "security fix" is pretty fast
and loose -- as yours seems to be.

> Depending
> on your definition of security. eg. Going 'select cash_out(2);' on any
> 7.2 server and below will crash the backend.

If you consider that a security flaw, there are still innumerable problems
of a very similar nature in 7.3 or 7.4-devel (*any* situation in which an
untrusted client can execute arbitrary SQL will allow for resource
exhaustion, at the very least).

By a more reasonable definition of "security flaw", I'm not aware of any
significant outstanding problems in 7.2.3 -- there are a bunch of buffer
handling fixes in 7.3, but they were made for the sake of correctness
(a.k.a. paranoia), not necessarily to fix an actual vulnerability.

Cheers,

Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-30 22:39:24 Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?
Previous Message Manfred Koizar 2002-12-30 18:50:52 Re: MOVE strangeness