Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> Seems gcc team does not agree...
> They are the ones coming to the conclusion quoted before.
> Can you tell me where I can find the C++ spec they are all talking about
> please ?
AFAIK the original ansi specs are not available without horrible fees, I
hope the link above contains accurate data.
Apparently, the spec *does* specify this brain dead restriction.
We have three alternatives to fix that:
- declare OnChange public. Maybe I should rearrange my knowledge to drop
the 'protected' keyword completely.
- Invent an intermediate class empty class above the current dlgProperty
without any methods just to create an accessible target.
- deny 3.4 support
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andreas Pflug||Date: 2004-08-15 13:43:14|
|Subject: 8.0 doc|
|Previous:||From: cvs||Date: 2004-08-15 12:41:43|
|Subject: CVS Commit by andreas: weird spec workaround for gcc 3.4|