Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Date: 2004-08-14 15:52:08
Message-ID: 411E3528.6030700@Yahoo.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On 8/14/2004 11:25 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
> 
>> The logic that says we are promoting a feature of the "postgresql 
>> project" (replication/win32) and that we should give people the best 
>> tool for the job even if it is commercial (mammoth/powergres)
> 
> The PostgreSQL project doesn't have replication, Slony is an addon 
> developed by Afilias and provided open source to the community ...

Wrong!

Slony is BSD, Copyright PGDG, hosted on gborg. And it allways has been. 
Could you please explain the difference between the PostgreSQL project 
and the Slony project with respect to property ownership? I fail to see 
one myself.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Robby RussellDate: 2004-08-14 16:01:24
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-08-14 15:25:51
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group