Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Quick coding question with acl fixes

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quick coding question with acl fixes
Date: 2004-07-29 05:49:54
Message-ID: 41089002.3070005@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>>When I run through the acl changing all references from the old owner to 
>>the new owner, should I combine the resulting acls if possible?  Because 
>>if the new owner already has some acls on that item, they will end up 
>>with two acls.
> 
> If possible ... how painful would it be to do?

I'm pretty close to finishing this.  Just applying it to all the 
acl'able objects atm.  It's a pain when you can only find 15 mins every 
other day to work on it :(

Chris


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2004-07-29 06:04:46
Subject: Re: try/catch macros for Postgres backend
Previous:From: Fabien COELHODate: 2004-07-29 05:22:59
Subject: Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group