Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
Date: 2004-07-27 10:41:49
Message-ID: 4106316D.2000605@mailblocks.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
Oliver Jowett wrote:
> I suppose so. I'd point out that the NIO byteorder info is really just 
> an optimization hint -- the rest of the NIO API is byteorder agnostic, 
> regardless of what the native byteorder is.
>
The rest of the NIO API is not agnostic. A java.nio.ByteBuffer is big 
endian by default and can be changed using the order method. This is the 
mechanism you'd use to implement I/O that can handle either endian type.

Regards,

Thomas Hallgren


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-07-27 11:28:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
Previous:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2004-07-27 10:10:57
Subject: Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-07-27 11:28:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
Previous:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2004-07-27 10:10:57
Subject: Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group