Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>,Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend
Date: 2004-07-26 14:42:53
Message-ID: 4105186D.1090600@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> If you want to put in the function and document that it may cause
> problems, I won't object; it's not like we don't have other features
> that are poorly implemented :-(.  But my vote would be to remove it.

I'm down with removing it - people don't read documentation :/

Chris

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-07-26 15:00:47
Subject: Re: [subxacts] Savepoint syntax
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-26 14:21:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group