Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> *sigh* - it's really not my day today. Attached is patch that actually
> compiles and fixes the problem. We will need to bump CATVERSION, and
Reviewed, tested, applied.
> maybe should test all the other qualified functions?
What other qualified functions? There might possibly be some issues in
contrib stuff, but there are no other SQL-language functions defined in
the main system (except information_schema, which we already checked).
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-10-21 16:29:41|
|Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2003-10-21 16:23:03|
|Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2003-10-22 01:27:39|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2003-10-21 15:56:25|
|Subject: Re: AIX port current|