Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
Date: 2003-10-21 16:27:45
Message-ID: 4103.1066753665@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> *sigh* - it's really not my day today.  Attached is patch that actually 
> compiles and fixes the problem.  We will need to bump CATVERSION, and 

Reviewed, tested, applied.

> maybe should test all the other qualified functions?

What other qualified functions?  There might possibly be some issues in
contrib stuff, but there are no other SQL-language functions defined in
the main system (except information_schema, which we already checked).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-21 16:29:41
Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-10-21 16:23:03
Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-10-22 01:27:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-21 15:56:25
Subject: Re: AIX port current

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group