Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: EOL for 7.4?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: EOL for 7.4?
Date: 2009-12-01 16:23:55
Message-ID: 40c0a3edbb591b56a576b8aa7d254dc1@biglumber.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


I wrote:

> No, it should be longer. June is practically around the corner
> as far as business planning is concerned. Make it a year. Since it's
> mid November, why not just say 2011?

This thread never got resolved. I think we can all agree that EOL
for 7.4 is a "when", not an "if"? Can we get -core to take a stance
here and pick a date? I like the clean smooth lines of January 2011,
and thus saying that 2010 is the last year in which we'll backpatch
things to the 7.4 branch. But I'll stick to whatever core thinks is
best. Just let the advocacy team know so we can start work on it.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200912011122
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAksVQtgACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj26ACgr/QRKytEc9dWYar0gY6HJZ0C
YYsAni96hrCF0AmBIjY/Fg5vHS+LauKT
=ELLh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-12-01 16:23:59
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-12-01 16:19:34
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group