Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)
Date: 2004-07-22 00:39:59
Message-ID: 40FF0CDF.4070509@coretech.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Looks good to me. Log file numbering scheme seems to have changed - is
that part of the fix too?.

Tom Lane wrote:

>
>This is done in CVS tip. Mark, could you retest to verify it's fixed?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-22 00:43:07 Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-21 22:43:55 Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-22 00:40:19 Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-07-22 00:39:17 Re: check point segments leakage ?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-22 00:43:07 Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery)
Previous Message Steve Holdoway 2004-07-22 00:29:11 Re: Borland c++ compile problems...