| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option |
| Date: | 2004-07-20 04:06:40 |
| Message-ID: | 40FC9A50.4090401@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> I see one vote in favor of its inclusion on the grounds it is a bug not
> to support multiple -t parameters. However, is someone objects I will
> have to hold it for 7.6. It needs SGML doc additions which I will do
> myself.
Weeeeell, I guess I'm against it based on the rules of feature freeze,
even though it would be really useful for me :(
I don't see how it's a "bug" to not support multiple parameters thought
- that's really scraping the bottom of the barrel...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-20 04:14:29 | Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-20 03:55:43 | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-20 04:14:29 | Re: PITR COPY Failure (was Point in Time Recovery) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-20 03:55:43 | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option |