Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> There is a huge difference between adhering to a standard and limiting
>> yourself to a standard. The real question is whether PostgreSQL's
>> goal is to support SQL standards, or whether PostgreSQL's goal is to
>> give PostgreSQL users a useful set of tools.
> There are literally _hundreds_ of fields we could add to the
> information_schema. Either we add them all or we add none of them.
Well, if we add them (and they would be very useful I reckon) should we
ensure there's an obvious PG naming thing happening?
or similar? Maybe not "pg_" but you know what I mean.
Regards and best wishes,
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Sabino Mullane||Date: 2004-07-02 02:24:58|
|Subject: Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns |
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2004-07-02 02:05:57|
|Subject: Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns|