Re: Bug with view definitions?

From: Justin Clift <jc(at)telstra(dot)net>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug with view definitions?
Date: 2004-07-01 15:04:55
Message-ID: 40E42817.4010408@telstra.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
<snip>
> I've still not checked any code. I don't even know what part of pg it is
> that produce that bad SQL. The view itself works, so it must be the pretty
> printer that is broken (where ever that is hidden away in the code).

Thanks Dennis.

So, it's definitely a bug then. I wasn't sure if it was PG or me. :)

Um, as I'm not up to the task of fixing it, is this something you or
someone else would be interested in?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-07-01 16:30:53 Re: Bug with view definitions?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-01 14:19:08 nested-xacts cursors (was Re: Performance with new nested-xacts code)