Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> I've still not checked any code. I don't even know what part of pg it is
> that produce that bad SQL. The view itself works, so it must be the pretty
> printer that is broken (where ever that is hidden away in the code).
So, it's definitely a bug then. I wasn't sure if it was PG or me. :)
Um, as I'm not up to the task of fixing it, is this something you or
someone else would be interested in?
Regards and best wishes,
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruno Wolff III||Date: 2004-07-01 16:30:53|
|Subject: Re: Bug with view definitions?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-07-01 14:19:08|
|Subject: nested-xacts cursors (was Re: Performance with new nested-xacts code)|