Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug with view definitions?

From: Justin Clift <jc(at)telstra(dot)net>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug with view definitions?
Date: 2004-07-01 15:04:55
Message-ID: 40E42817.4010408@telstra.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
<snip>
> I've still not checked any code. I don't even know what part of pg it is 
> that produce that bad SQL. The view itself works, so it must be the pretty 
> printer that is broken (where ever that is hidden away in the code).

Thanks Dennis.

So, it's definitely a bug then.  I wasn't sure if it was PG or me.  :)

Um, as I'm not up to the task of fixing it, is this something you or 
someone else would be interested in?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2004-07-01 16:30:53
Subject: Re: Bug with view definitions?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-01 14:19:08
Subject: nested-xacts cursors (was Re: Performance with new nested-xacts code)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group