Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
<snip>
> I've still not checked any code. I don't even know what part of pg it is 
> that produce that bad SQL. The view itself works, so it must be the pretty 
> printer that is broken (where ever that is hidden away in the code).

Thanks Dennis.

So, it's definitely a bug then.  I wasn't sure if it was PG or me.  :)

Um, as I'm not up to the task of fixing it, is this something you or 
someone else would be interested in?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

In response to

• Re: Bug with view definitions? at 2004-07-01 13:19:32 from Dennis Bjorklund

Responses

• Re: Bug with view definitions? at 2004-07-01 18:13:04 from Andreas Pflug

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruno Wolff III	Date: 2004-07-01 16:30:53
	Subject: Re: Bug with view definitions?
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2004-07-01 14:19:08
	Subject: nested-xacts cursors (was Re: Performance with new nested-xacts code)