Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking
Date: 2004-06-17 19:02:56
Message-ID: 40D1EAE0.8050909@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Tom Lane wrote:

>>Right, we can just close the pipe.  I was thinking of adding another
>>signal but that's obviously easier.  Will work on making this happen.
>>    
>>
>
>... except there is no postmaster pipe anymore --- back to plan A.
>
>  
>

Did we get a resolution on this?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2004-06-17 20:58:12
Subject: PostgreSQL SCM
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2004-06-17 16:46:00
Subject: problem compiling C++ modules in /contrib

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group