Tom Lane wrote:
> ISTM we had decided that putting vast amounts of documentation into the
> file comments was exactly the thing *not* to do.  It duplicates the SGML
> documentation, thereby doubling the maintenance effort, to very little
> purpose.

I agree. If people really think that adding more comments to 
pg_hba.conf is a good idea, I think the best way to do that is to 
automatically extract that information from the main SGML docs.

-Neil

In response to

• Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes at 2004-06-01 21:33:47 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes at 2004-06-02 03:00:03 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: pgsql	Date: 2004-06-02 00:34:44
	Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] select like...not using index
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2004-06-01 23:28:59
	Subject: Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info