Tom Lane wrote:
> ISTM we had specifically rejected the prior version of this (the one
> from Ben Reed) for some reason, which I do not recall at the moment.
> If the archives were up, I'd go look, but in the meantime please do
> not apply.
I had thought it was only because the "marking something as a module or
not" thing was a big change and needed more review, but honestly I don't
recall either, and I was having trouble finding the previous discussion
in list archives.
Benjamin Reed, a.k.a. RangerRick
ranger(at)befunk(dot)com / http://ranger.befunk.com/
In response to
pgsql-ports by date
|Next:||From: Супермаркет||Date: 2004-05-26 16:49:26|
|Subject: Сдается в аренду действующий продуктовый магазин <СУПЕРМАРКЕТ> от собственника|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-05-20 17:34:08|
|Subject: Re: libpq and libecpg problems on MacOs-X (Panther/10.3.3) |