Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch #2

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch #2
Date: 2004-05-13 20:39:33
Message-ID: 40A3DD05.2020508@zeut.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32
Dave Page wrote:

>Any comments/criticisms/gasps of horror at all the win32 code? :-)
>

Sorry for not jumping in sooner but I have been offline for several days.

Anyway, not having looked at this at all, how will this be effected when 
pg_autovacuum is integrated into the backend.  I assume that the 
postmaster can be run as a win32 service, and if it launches and kills 
pg_autovacuum automatically, do you need to do anything for pg_autovacuum?

Matthew


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael BrusserDate: 2004-05-13 20:58:41
Subject: Re: negative pid?
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-05-13 20:35:08
Subject: Re: mingw configure failure detection

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-05-13 22:59:31
Subject: Re: mingw configure failure detection
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-05-13 20:35:08
Subject: Re: mingw configure failure detection

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group