Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com>,Carlos Eduardo Smanioto <csmanioto(at)uol(dot)com(dot)br>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-05-06 08:13:10
Message-ID: 4099F396.2020103@archonet.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-performance
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>> What's the case of bigger database PostgreSQL (so greate and amount of
>>> registers) that they know???
> 
> 
> Didn't someone say that RedSheriff had a 10TB postgres database or 
> something?

 From http://www.redsheriff.com/us/news/news_4_201.html

"According to the company, RedSheriff processes 10 billion records a 
month and the total amount of data managed is more than 32TB. Griffin 
said PostgreSQL has been in production for 12 months with not a single 
database fault in that time “The stability of the database can not be 
questioned. Needless to say, we are extremely happy."

I think it's safe to assume this is not on a spare Dell 600SC though.

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2004-05-06 08:43:25
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-05-06 01:48:30
Subject: Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2004-05-06 08:43:25
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL
Previous:From: BruceDate: 2004-05-06 02:59:01
Subject: I understand now

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group