Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib,

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib,
Date: 2004-04-28 14:02:33
Message-ID: 408FB979.6050705@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jon Jensen wrote:

>On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
>
>
>>>>Seriously - I'd like to raise my voice in favor of installing plpgsql
>>>>in template1 by default. I haven't heard any good reason not to (nor
>>>>even a bad reason).
>>>>
>>>>
>>It has to work with older dumps that will try to recreate pl/pgsql
>>themselves explicitly.
>>
>>
>
>This wouldn't be a problem, though, would it? The dumps don't run inside a
>transaction so after the failure to create PL/PgSQL because it already
>exists, the import would continue as before.
>
>
>

We could make it somewhat cleaner by having a flag on pg_dump that
allowed/suppressed the language creation for plpgsql.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-04-28 14:38:40 Re: Advice regarding configuration parameters
Previous Message Tim Larson 2004-04-28 13:49:57 Re: OLAP versus Materialized Views?