Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks

From: Nick Barr <nicky(at)chuckie(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Date: 2004-04-21 08:31:39
Message-ID: 4086316B.4050304@chuckie.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Hi,

Has anyone had a look at:

http://people.ac.upc.es/zgomez/

I realize that MySQL & PG cannot really be compared (especially when you 
consider the issues that MySQL has with things like data integrity) but 
still surely PG would perform better than the stats show (i.e. #7 31.28 
seconds versus 42 minutes!!!).

On a side note it certainly looks like linux kernel 2.6 is quite a bit 
faster in comparision to 2.4.

Nick




Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Edoardo CeccarelliDate: 2004-04-21 08:34:48
Subject: Re: slow seqscan
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-04-21 07:52:55
Subject: Re: slow seqscan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group