Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Date: 2010-03-01 19:32:24
Message-ID: 407d949e1003011132y430066f0sea04a0b03fe6fcfc@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Completely aside from that, how many users are going to be happy with a
> slave server which is constantly 5 minutes behind?
>

Uhm, well all the ones who are happy with our current warm standby
setup for one?

And all the ones who are looking for a standby reporting server rather
than a high availability DR site.

For what it's worth Oracle has an option to have your standby
intentionally hold back n minutes behind and I've seen that set to 5
minutes.

-- 
greg

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2010-03-01 19:35:37
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-01 19:25:00
Subject: Re: Make plpgsql throw error for SELECT ... INTO rowtypevar , ... ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group