| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Ragi Y(dot) Burhum" <rburhum(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: knngist patch support |
| Date: | 2010-02-11 14:51:46 |
| Message-ID: | 407d949e1002110651t1e4b06a1tfd625812b83ad37c@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> In my understanding
>> this was always enough to submit code. User's documentation is depend on
>> discussion and review and can be added later
>> before releasing beta.
>
> Several people have said this lately, but it doesn't match what I've
> seen of our practice over the last year and a half;
Perhaps the confusion is that we often say not to worry about the
quality of the English in the documentation. That's because it's easy
for a reviewer to fix up the English but not so easy to figure out
what you intend the behaviour to be.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-02-11 14:55:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-02-11 14:42:04 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |