Re: Whitelisting?

Is there any evidence that spammers use longer headers than non-spammers?

Incidentally my earlier post to pgsql-advocacy was initially refused due to
being over the message limit. I had to reduce the image quality to get out
through.

These days I think spammers try to make short messages and headers in an
effort to avoid any signals which catch their messages.

greg

On 2 Feb 2010 20:18, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:

On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Selena Deckelmann wrote:

> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> > <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Selena Deckelmann escribi?:
>>
>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Can we whitelist robert(at)pg-live(dot)info? He's got some large headers
>> that
>> >>> are tripping up ...
>>
> >
> >
> > I like that solution too!
> >
> > The high water mark was about 500. Here's an example error messa...
>

Does doubling to 512 sound okay? Or should I just go straight to 1024?
thoughts?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664
MSN:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org<MSN%3Ascrappy(at)hub(dot)org>

--
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscriptio...