Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication, loose ends

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Date: 2010-01-15 22:38:42
Message-ID: 407d949e1001151438t796a948eu3ef054b3d33bda99@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 19:29 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> How about "Log Streaming Replication"?
>
> So its a particular kind of replication, which seems correct to me.

I thought the whole point of this effort was to be able to bill it as
a built-in easy replication which was perceived as a major hole in
Postgres's feature set.

-- 
greg

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-01-15 22:39:12
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Previous:From: J. Greg DavidsonDate: 2010-01-15 22:37:09
Subject: Re: xml2 still essential for us

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group