Re: pg_ctl

From: David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Date: 2004-03-24 20:14:22
Message-ID: 4061EC1E.9020001@zara.6.isreserved.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Tom Lane wrote:
>>Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl
>>in C?
>
> Why bother? I should think that Windows users want to run PG as a service.

Except when a non administrator wants to run his own PG instance.

--
dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-03-24 22:30:20 Re: pg_ctl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-24 17:38:37 Re: pg_ctl