Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Subbiah, Stalin" <SSubbiah(at)netopia(dot)com>,"'pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
Date: 2004-03-24 08:53:31
Message-ID: 40614C8B.8070207@paradise.net.nz (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:

>Mark,
>
>  
>
>>It might be worth considering Apple if you want a 64-bit chip that has a
>>clock speed comparable to Intel's - the Xserv is similarly priced to Sun
>>V210 (both dual cpu 1U's).
>>    
>>
>
>Personally I'd stay *far* away from the XServs until Apple learns to build 
>some real server harware.    The current XServs have internal parts more 
>appropriate to a Dell desktop (promise controller, low-speed commodity IDE 
>drives), than a server.
>
>If Apple has prices these IU desktop machines similar to Sun, then I sense 
>doom ahead for the Apple Server Division.
>
>  
>
(thinks...) Point taken - the Xserv is pretty "entry level"...

However, having recently benchmarked  a 280R vs a PIII Dell using a 
Promise ide raid controller - and finding the Dell comparable (with 
write cache *disabled*), I suspect that the Xserv has a pretty good 
chance of outperforming a V210  (certainly would be interesting to try 
out....)

What I think has happened is that over the last few years then "cheap / 
slow" ide stuff has gotten pretty fast - even when you make "write mean 
write"....

cheers

Mark


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2004-03-24 09:09:02
Subject: Re: Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait!
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2004-03-24 03:42:20
Subject: Re: SLOW query with aggregates

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2004-03-24 11:11:33
Subject: Re: Cache loolup failed problems with tsearch following
Previous:From: Adam RuthDate: 2004-03-24 03:31:46
Subject: Re: Databases Vs. Schemas

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group