Re: pg_autovacuum next steps

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum next steps
Date: 2004-03-22 01:31:57
Message-ID: 405E420D.8070304@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I think these configuration issues will become a lot easier if you make
> the autovacuum daemon a subprocess of the postmaster (like, say, the
> checkpoint process). Then you have access to a host of methods for
> storing state, handling configuration, etc.

Yeah - why delay making it a backend process? :)

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-22 01:48:55 Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-03-22 00:37:38 Re: pg_autovacuum next steps