Re: DBD::PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Wheeler <david(at)wheeler(dot)net>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, dbi-dev(at)perl(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DBD::PostgreSQL
Date: 2002-11-18 17:39:02
Message-ID: 405.1037641142@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

David Wheeler <david(at)wheeler(dot)net> writes:
> PostgreSQL gets better and better. Yay. However, although I might be
> able to use compile-time macros to determine the PostgreSQL version, I
> have to support a minimum version of PostsgreSQL in the driver. I was
> thinking 7.0 -- maybe it's time to leave the 6.x series behind.

It's way past time to forget 6.* ;-). Based on what we see in the
mailing lists, hardly anyone is on 7.0.* either, and the people on
7.1.* all know they need to upgrade.

For a newly coded DBD driver, I think you could get away with setting a
baseline requirement of a 7.2 server. Maybe even 7.3, if you wanted to
be a hard case (and you aren't planning to release for a few months).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Bunce 2002-11-18 17:44:08 Re: DBD::PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-18 17:38:51 Re: [GENERAL] DECLARE CURSOR

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Bunce 2002-11-18 17:44:08 Re: DBD::PostgreSQL
Previous Message Ian Barwick 2002-11-18 17:36:02 Re: DBD::PostgreSQL