Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If that doesn't create any new warnings on the current (fixed) code,
> then I agree with this.
(Right, it does not.)
> However, I'd like to see it factored more to
> avoid repeating it for jade and nsgmls. The warning flags are in fact
> SP flags, not Jade flags; only Jade is built on top of SP. So maybe
> assign this to SPFLAGS and add that to both invocations. (This is a
> bit analogous to CPPFLAGS vs. CFLAGS.)
Attached is a patch that does this.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2004-02-29 18:09:45|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2004-02-29 17:01:25|
|Subject: Re: enable jade warnings|