Re: log_line_info

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: log_line_info
Date: 2004-02-29 13:19:03
Message-ID: 4041E6C7.1000200@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>I will do docs. We could sensibly get rid of log_pid and
>>log_timestamp with my latest patch. I would also suggest getting rid
>>of log_source_port, since there really isn't any reason *not* to log
>>the source port.
>>
>>
>
>There is the very definite possibility that people don't care.
>
>

The only thing I can see where it actually makes a difference is in the
ps display (and it is currently a bit broken anyway, as it uses
"host:port" there, which won't work nicely with IP6 addresses).
Connection and disconnection logging currently always log the source
port, regardless of the setting.

If you think the ability to have it in or out of the ps display is
important enough, we can certainly leave it in - either way I will fix it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2004-02-29 14:08:07 Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-29 13:11:04 Re: log_line_info

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-29 13:25:49 Docs slightly broken
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-29 13:11:04 Re: log_line_info