Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: log_line_info

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: log_line_info
Date: 2004-02-29 13:19:03
Message-ID: 4041E6C7.1000200@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>  
>
>>I will do docs. We could sensibly get rid of log_pid and
>>log_timestamp with my latest patch. I would also suggest getting rid
>>of log_source_port, since there really isn't any reason *not* to log
>>the source port.
>>    
>>
>
>There is the very definite possibility that people don't care.
>  
>

The only thing I can see where it actually makes a difference is in the 
ps display (and it is currently a bit broken anyway, as it uses 
"host:port" there, which won't work nicely with IP6 addresses). 
Connection and disconnection logging currently always log the source 
port, regardless of the setting.

If you think the ability to have it in or out of the ps display is 
important enough, we can certainly leave it in  - either way I will fix it.

cheers

andrew


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2004-02-29 14:08:07
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-29 13:11:04
Subject: Re: log_line_info

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-29 13:25:49
Subject: Docs slightly broken
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-29 13:11:04
Subject: Re: log_line_info

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group