Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage

From: Rob Fielding <rob(at)dsvr(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage
Date: 2004-02-29 13:08:01
Message-ID: 4041E430.7010109@dsvr.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr pgsql-performance

Rod Taylor wrote:

>>random_page_cost = 0.5
>>
>>
>
>Try a value of 2 for a while.
>
>
>
OK thanks Richard and Rod. I've upped this to 2. I think I left this
over from a previous play with setttings on my IDE RAID 0 workstation.
It seemed to have a good effect being set as a low float so it stuck.

I've set it to 2.

From another post off list, I've also bumped up

max_fsm_relations = 1000 # min 10, fsm
max_fsm_pages = 20000 # min 1000, fs
vacuum_mem = 32768 # min 1024

as they did seem a little low. I'm hesitant to set them too high at this
stage as I'd prefer to keep as much RAM available for runtime at this time.

I'm still hoping that perhaps the uber-pgadmin Mr Lane might reply about
my WAL issue :) however I'm getting the feeling now the server is
running with a much higher level of performance than it has been. Won't
know until tomorrow thought.

Cheers,

--
Rob Fielding
Development
Designer Servers Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-29 13:11:04 Re: log_line_info
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-02-29 12:46:33 Re: log_line_info

Browse pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Fielding 2004-03-01 17:30:41 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-02-29 00:52:52 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-03-01 07:30:58 Re: FreeBSD config
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-02-29 00:52:52 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage