Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Kenji Sugita writes:
>> This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
> Why would one want to do that?
AFAICS the point of oid2name is to provide a mapping between disk file
names and table names. As such, what it *ought* to be doing is
suppressing views, since those don't have disk files --- they are only
cluttering the listing with irrelevant data. If we put that in, there'd
be no need to special-case information_schema.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2003-07-21 15:20:05|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] pg_tables view definition incorrect??|
|Previous:||From: Rod Taylor||Date: 2003-07-21 12:36:13|
|Subject: Re: Release.sgml markup|