Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join"

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, mike(at)linkify(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join"
Date: 2004-02-27 06:49:30
Message-ID: 403EE87A.40405@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mike Mascari wrote:

> Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 mike(at)linkify(dot)com wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using postgresl 7.3.2 and have a query that executes very slowly.
>>>
>>> There are 2 tables: Item and LogEvent. ItemID (an int4) is the
>>> primary key
>>> of Item, and is also a field in LogEvent. Some ItemIDs in LogEvent
>>> do not
>>> correspond to ItemIDs in Item, and periodically we need to purge the
>>> non-matching ItemIDs from LogEvent.
>>
>> Perhaps
>> delete from LogEvent where EventType != 'i' and not exists
>> (select * from Item i where i.ItemID=LogEvent.ItemID);
>
>
> Maybe I'm not reading his subquery correctly, but the left outer join
> will produce a row from LogEvent regardless of whether or not a matching
> row exists in Item, correct? So doesn't it reduce to:
>
> DELETE FROM LogEvent WHERE EventType <> 'i';

I failed to read what he was trying to accomplish and assumed the
original query was precisely what he intended. My apologies...

Mike Mascari

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mike 2004-02-27 06:50:57 Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join'
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2004-02-27 06:45:50 Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join"