Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 23:57:05
Message-ID: 403E87D1.2000202@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-www

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Josh Berkus wrote:
>  
>
>>The question is, do we need BZ right off or should we try GForge's
>>lightweight tool first?    Personally I find that BZ is a little
>>intimidating to new users, particularly for searching on issues; as a
>>result it tends to lead to a lot of duplicate filings.
>>    
>>
>
>I think we had previously decided that we will not allow a random user 
>off the street to file bug reports into whatever system we end up 
>using.  I see it primarily as a bug *tracking* system, not a bug 
>*reporting* system.
>
>  
>

I don't recall that there was a consensus about that. The difference 
between BZ's "unconfirmed" and "new" states is that the latter means it 
has been triaged. See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/bug_status.html .

I certainly don't think we should impose such a restrictive rule on 
every project that we might host on a GForge installation.

cheers

andrew


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-27 02:08:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-02-26 23:20:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-02-27 01:50:11
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-02-26 23:20:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-27 02:08:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-02-26 23:20:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-27 02:08:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-02-26 23:20:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group