Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 20:41:26
Message-ID: 403E59F6.7000600@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-www

Josh Berkus wrote:

>Peter,
>
>  
>
>>So yes, I 
>>think this is a reasonable plan, just don't expect "collaboration" to 
>>suddenly appear out of nowhere.
>>    
>>
>
>Yeah.  As my grandfather used to say, "You can lead a horse to water, but you 
>can't make him shrink."  (granddad is under care, now).
>
>Everyone:  Further data: if we prefer BugZilla to GForge's lighter-weight bug 
>tracking, it turns out that there is a BZ plug-in for GForge. 
>  
>

Perhaps when BZ supports PG - some progress is being made on that front, 
but it's not a done deal yet.

cheers

andrew


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Alexey BorzovDate: 2004-02-26 20:48:56
Subject: Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?
Previous:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 20:31:17
Subject: Upgraded Site..any news ?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 21:03:36
Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-02-26 20:32:05
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 21:03:36
Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2004-02-26 20:38:47
Subject: Re: ORDER BY different locales

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 21:03:36
Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-02-26 20:28:44
Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group