Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: pg_dump scripts are no longer ordinary-user friendly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: pg_dump scripts are no longer ordinary-user friendly
Date: 2001-03-06 03:26:35
Message-ID: 4039.983849195@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 21:37 5/03/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>>> ... we could go back to the old model of only updating
>>> pg_class in a data-only dump/restore.
>> 
>> Works for me ...

> Should we have an option to turn off this feature entirely?

Now that you mention it, is it a feature at all?  Or a bug?  ISTM poor
form for a data-only restore to assume it may turn off all pre-existing
triggers.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2001-03-06 03:27:23
Subject: Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2001-03-06 03:24:11
Subject: Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group