Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>> Attached is a corrected version that solves the query cancel problem by
>> not napping any more and going full speed as soon as any signal is
>> pending. If nobody objects, I'm going to commit this tomorrow.
> Jan, three questions. First, is this useful now that we have the new
> cache replacement code, second, do we need this many parameters (can't
> any of them be autotuned), and third, what about documentation?
You mean if stopping to nap is useful when a signal is pending or if
napping during vacuum itself is useful at all?
I am willing to make it all self tuning and automagic. Just tell me how.
Documentation is missing so far. Will work on that.
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-02-12 20:38:35|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Delay feature|
|Previous:||From: Rich Hall||Date: 2004-02-12 20:18:51|
|Subject: Re: Transaction aborts on syntax error.|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2004-02-12 20:22:43|
|Subject: win32 setitimer implementation|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-02-12 19:58:17|
|Subject: Re: Patch for psql startup clarity|