Re: Compile Vs RPMs

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Anjan Dave <adave(at)vantage(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Compile Vs RPMs
Date: 2004-02-03 22:43:08
Message-ID: 402023FC.7000007@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Anjan Dave wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know whether there are any significant performance
> advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and
> 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm)
> from the postgresql site? Hardware is Intel XEON (various speeds, upto
> 2.8GHz, single/dual/quad configuration).

"significant" is a relative term. 1% can be significant under the proper
circumstances ...

http://www.potentialtech.com/wmoran/source.php

The information isn't specific to Postgres, and the results aren't really
conclusive, but hopefully it helps.

I really think that if someone would actually test this with Postgres and
post the results, it would be very beneficial to the community. I have
it on my list of things to do, but it's unlikely to get done in the first
quarter the way things are going.

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Thomas 2004-02-03 23:01:47 Re: Compile Vs RPMs
Previous Message Kevin 2004-02-03 22:29:41 Database conversion woes...