Re: sequence in schema -- broken default

> Yes. I was just including that in case something had changed in
> recent versions. I guess it just seemed strange to me that this
> works ...
>
> # create table x (a int, b int);
> CREATE TABLE
> # insert into x values(5);
> INSERT 18518 1
>
> but this does not ...
>
> # insert into x values();
> ERROR: syntax error at or near ")" at character 22
>
Actually if you think about it, it makes sense. At least from the
example you provide.
insert into x values(5) is a integer insertion, and it just inserts into
the first column but
the second example insert into x values() specifies a blank value. A
blank is a string
(versus a NULL which is nothing) and the parser barfs on it with an
integer. Although
you will get a different error, insert into x values ('') will also fail.

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL